This is a copy of the response I wrote to members of the Flathead Lake co-op management plan. Please read and if you have any comment about the future of Flathead Lake and the co-managment plan, please email your comment to rosel@cskt.org Remember to stay involved and let your voice be heard.
Barry;
Let me start by saying, thank you for allowing me the opportunity to be involved in the process.
I agree with the plan to reduce the number of lake trout to bring back the native bull trout and west slope cutthroat trout. The question remains how do we do that?
I think there are more questions than answers. Many excellent questions have been asked.
1. How do we measure success?
2. What is the number of redds, to agree that the bull trout are on the increase, stable, or secure? We have a basic problem if the agencies cannot agree on the definition of stable, or secure levels. The agencies cannot agree on the creel data. How do we move forward without coming to some agreement on the data and how the data is defined? The redd count is the only measurable way to evaluate the population of the bull trout, so we need to look closer at the entire system in the life of the bull trout. The fact that the bull trout (redds) have not decreased measures some degree of success. It has been stated that what has been done in the past nine years has had no effect. Quoting Tom McDonald in the Daily Inter Lake Sunday, April 4, 2010 he states “However, we believe it is possible and imperative to stop the downward spiral of the bull trout population. Tom goes on to say, frankly, bull trout are just hanging on by their caudal fins. Tom states,
that the exploding lake trout population, the native bull trout are in serious danger of vanishing from the lake. But you say the lake trout have reached capacity. How does a population keep exploding if the lake cannot hold any more? The redd counts suggest that the bull trout are not declining, in fact they seem to be holding their own.
3. Is success attainable?
4. How do we measure success? I feel that the fact that the bull trout have NOT crashed proves that they are not going extinct.
5. Maybe a better course of action might be how do we stop the spread of lake trout out of the Flathead Lake system.
6. Maybe containment is a better approach than reduction. Can we contain the lake trout to Flathead Lake? Can we keep the lake trout out of the upper lakes?
7. Can we have a viable fishery and low numbers of lake trout at the same time. The user days are going up dramatically with the Mack Days value. This is a true success story. The public wants to catch fish!
8. I propose a year round bounty to promote more fishermen involvement for the next 5 years. Re-evaluate the redds, the increase in participation and the catch rates for the next 5 years after that. Now that the value of the lake trout has gone up, the public is expecting it to continue and this has put a commercial value on the lake trout.
9. If the number of bull trout in the system goes up, wouldn’t the predation on the cutthroat also goes up, especially in the upper river system?
10. I would also suggest a do-nothing approach for the next five years. If the lake is at carrying capacity for lake trout, then we agree that the population of lake trout is not going to increase, then the lake trout would not have a effect on the decrease of the bull trout.
Sincerely;
Bob Orsua
Flathead Lake Outfitters and Guides